Why do Ministers Ask for Policy Evaluation Studies? The Case of the Flemish Government

Author:

Pattyn ValérieORCID,De Peuter Bart,Brans Marleen

Abstract

AbstractPolicy evaluations can be set up for multiple purposes including accountability, policy learning and policy planning. The question is, however, how these purposes square with politics itself. To date, there is little knowledge on how government ministers present the rationale of evaluations. This article is the first to provide a diachronic study of discourse about evaluation purposes and encompass a wide range of policy fields. We present an analysis of evaluation announcements in so-called ministerial policy notes issued between 1999 and 2019 by the Flemish government in Belgium. The research fine-tunes available evidence on catalysts for conducting evaluations. The Flemish public sector turns out to be a strong case where New Public Management brought policy evaluation onto the agenda, but this has not resulted in a prominent focus on accountability-oriented evaluations. We further show that policy fields display different evaluation cultures, albeit more in terms of the volume of evaluation demand than in terms of preferences for particular evaluation purposes.

Funder

Leiden University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference46 articles.

1. Argyris, Chris. 1976. Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly 21(3):363–375.

2. Barbier, Jean-Claude (ed.). 2012. Introduction. In Evaluation cultures. Sense-making in complex times, 1–18. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

3. Boswell, Christina (ed.). 2018. Performance measurement and the production of trust. In Manufacturing political trust: targets and performance indicators in public policy, 5–29. Cambridge: University Press.

4. Bovens, Mark. 2010. Two concepts of accountability: accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism. West European Politics 33(5):946–967.

5. Bovens, Mark, Paul ’T Hart, and Sanneke Kuipers. 2006. The politics of policy evaluation. In The Oxford handbook of public policy, ed. Robert E. Goodin, Michael Moran, and Martin Rein, 319–335. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3