Loyal Allies or Stubborn Establishment?

Author:

Böller FlorianORCID

Abstract

AbstractTo what extent was U.S. President Donald J. Trump’s populist foreign policy agenda supported by the Republican Party (GOP) in Congress? A bourgeoning literature on Congress and U.S. foreign policy has identified increasing partisan disagreement on international issues. Trump’s “America First” policy may have further incited division and ideological controversies. At the same time, the 45th U.S. president’s foreign and security policies were, to a large degree, at odds with traditional GOP policy positions. To understand executive–legislative relations on foreign and security policy during the Trump administration, and in particular the role of the GOP, this paper first investigates voting records in Congress during the Obama and Trump presidencies. The analysis reveals that the reaction to Trump’s “America First” doctrine was not uniform and that parts of the GOP asserted themselves against the president. To explain the sources of this variance, the article focuses on two policy areas with varied GOP positioning: arms control (pro Trump) and foreign aid (contra Trump). In sum, the analysis reveals that some Republicans with traditionalist views (the so-called GOP establishment) opposed some of Trump’s anti-internationalist policies, in particular those that contradicted long-standing GOP preferences regarding vital U.S. security interests. At the same time, Republicans supported Trump on issues where the GOP could continue its policy preference, on arms control in particular.

Funder

Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern-Landau

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference102 articles.

1. Amirfar, Catherine, and Ashika Singh. 2018. The trump administration and the “Unmaking” of international agreements. Harvard International Law Journal 59(2):443–460.

2. Beauchamp, Zack. 2017. 2 Senate Republicans tried to define Trump’s foreign policy—and gave opposite answers. Vox. https://www.vox.com/world/2017/2/8/14549240/donald-trump-elliott-abrams-rand-paul-tom-cotton. Accessed 1 Feb 2023.

3. Berg, Manfred. 2021. The decline of political trust and the rise of populism in the United States. In Authority and trust in US culture and society. Interdisciplinary approaches and perspectives, ed. Manfred Berg, Günter Leypoldt, 37–60. Bielefeldt: transcript.

4. Blum, Rachel M., and Christopher S. Parker. 2019. Trump-ing foreign affairs: status threat and foreign policy preferences on the right. Perspectives on Politics 17(3):737–755.

5. Böller, Florian. 2022. Vandenberg vanished: US congress and the politicization of military interventions. Parliamentary Affairs 75(3):676–696.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3