Author:
Kneuer Marianne,Datts Mario
Abstract
AbstractThe emergence of the Internet fueled euphoric—partially utopian—visions that can be summarized as democratic promises. In most cases, the normative and empirical discussion so far has considered e‑democracy tools and their potential, regardless of the scale of interaction—be it local, national, or transnational—as a one-size-fits-all approach, assuming that what is applicable for the national level will be equally true for the subnational and transnational levels. We argue that the question of whether the Internet and digital tools can fulfill the democratic promises must be confronted in a more differentiated way, examining under which spatial conditions e‑democracy is more likely to incentivize citizens to engage and to involve more citizens as well as marginalized citizens in public debates and decision making. The article introduces scale as a new element for a better theoretical understanding of e‑democracy. We establish a conceptual framework that enables us to capture scale as distance in terms of territorial, cognitive, and affective distance. The spatial perspective brings an innovative spin to the somewhat petrified positions on the mobilizing or reinforcing effects of digital tools as well as a new theoretical argument for the debate on e‑democracy in general.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference101 articles.
1. Adams, Paul C., and Rina Ghose. 2003. India.com. The construction of a space between. Progress in Human Geography 27:414–437.
2. Anderson, Ashley A., Dominique Brossard, Dietram A. Scheufele, Michael A. Xenos, and Peter Ladwig. 2014. The “nasty effect:” Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19:373–387.
3. Avram, Gabriela (ed.). 2015. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on communities and technologies—C&T ’15. New York: ACM Press.
4. Barber, Benjamin R. 1998. Wie demokratisch ist das Internet? In Internet & Politik. Von der Zuschauer– zur Beteiligungsdemokratie?, ed. Claus Leggewie, 120–133. Köln: Bollmann.
5. Barberá, Pablo, John T. Jost, Jonathan Nagler, Joshua A. Tucker, and Richard Bonneau. 2015. Tweeting from left to right: Is online political Communication more than an Echo Chamber? Psychological science 26:1531–1542.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献