Abstract
AbstractThis article studies how different systems of policy advice are suited to provide relevant knowledge in times of acute crisis. The notion of evidence-based policymaking (EBP) originated in the successful 1997 New Labour program in the United Kingdom to formulate policy based not on ideology but on sound empirical evidence. We provide a brief overview of the history of the concept and the current debates around it. We then outline the main characteristics of the policy advisory systems in Germany, Switzerland, and Italy through which scientific knowledge—in the form of either person-bound expertise or evidence generated through standard scientific processes—was fed into policy formulation processes before the COVID-19 crisis. Whereas EBP takes place in the form of institutionalized advisory bodies and draws on expertise rather than on evidence in Germany, the system in Switzerland focuses more on the use of evidence provided through external mandates. Italy has a hybrid politicized expert system. The article then analyzes how this different prioritization of expertise vs. evidence in the three countries affects policymakers’ capacity to include scientific knowledge in policy decisions in times of acute crisis. The comparison of the three countries implies that countries with policy advisory systems designed to use expertise are better placed to incorporate scientific knowledge into their decisions in times of acute crisis than are countries with policy advisory systems that relied primarily on evidence before the COVID-19 crisis.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Research Project of National Interest, Italy
University of Bern
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference55 articles.
1. Asha, Behdinan, Gunn Elliot, Baral Prativa, Sritharan Lathika, Patrick Fafard, and Steven J. Hoffman. 2018. An overview of systematic reviews to inform the institutional design of scientific advisory committees. Global Challenges 2(9):1–9.
2. Balthasar, Andreas. 2010. Are there bases for evidence-based health policy in Switzerland? Factors influencing the extent of evaluation activity in health policy in the Swiss cantons. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 6(3):333–349.
3. Boin, Arjen, Magnus Ekengren, and Mark Rhinard. 2020. Hiding in plain sight: conceptualizing the creeping crisis. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 11(2):116–138.
4. Bundesamt für Gesundheit (BAG). 2021b. Covid-19 Schweiz. Informationen zur aktuellen Lage, Stand 08. April 2021. https://www.covid19.admin.ch/de/epidemiologic/case?detTime=total. Accessed 9 Apr 2021.
5. Cairney, Paul. 2016. The politics of evidence-based policy making. London: Springer.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献