Abstract
AbstractCan relatively short-term political leadership affect long-term national policy styles, and if so, how? We examine these questions in order to explain the temporal dynamics in national policy styles observed in several recent studies whose findings have challenged the traditional view that policy styles lend continuity and stability to policy-making. In its original formulation, the concept of policy styles refers to the extent to which governments are committed to anticipatory or reactive policy-making, as well as to whether they seek to reach consensus with societal groups over policies or simply impose decisions on them. Following these definitions, we contend that political leaders can alter a long-held policy style and often do so due to strategic considerations, either in an attempt to improve their policy performance or in response to an exogenous shock, such as an economic crisis. We illustrate this argument by using longitudinal records of changes in country-level governance indicators which include data on dimensions of policy styles. Specifically we examine how two of the Sustainable Governance Indicators compiled by the Bertelsmann Foundation changed for Ireland, Italy, Malta, and Poland between 2014 and 2020. As the cases show, government leaders sought to alter long-standing processes and the arrangements of governance and policy-making. Our empirical findings support the overarching argument that the study of national policy styles should be combined with that of political leadership.
Funder
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference88 articles.
1. Adam, Christian, Steffen Hurka, and Christoph Knill. 2017. Four styles of regulation and their implications for comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 19(4):327–344.
2. Adam, Christian, Steffen Hurka, Christoph Knill, and Yves Steinebach. 2019. Policy accumulation and the democratic responsiveness trap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bandelow, Nils C., Nicole Herweg, Johanna Hornung, and Reimut Zohlnhöfer. 2022. Public policy research—born in the U.S.A., at home in the world? Politische Vierteljahresschrift. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00396-5.
4. Bandelow, Nils C., and Johanna Hornung. 2022. How do good governance and democratic quality affect policy performance? European Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1135.
5. Béland, Daniel. 2007. Ideas and institutional change in social security: conversion, layering, and policy drift. Social Science Quarterly 88(1):20–38.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献