Abstract
AbstractThe concept of food sovereignty is primarily taken as an alternative to the prevailing neoliberal food security model. However, the approach has hitherto not received adequate attention from policy makers. This could be because the discourse is marked by controversies and contradictions, particularly regarding its ability to address the challenges of feeding a rapidly growing global population. In response to these criticisms, this paper argues that the principles of food sovereignty, such as democratic and transparent food systems, agroecology, and local market prioritization, should be fundamental pillars for achieving sustainable food security. It acknowledges that neither food sovereignty nor food security models alone can guarantee long-term food security, thus advocating for a blended approach that integrates these perspectives into a complex and interconnected system. This paper makes three significant contributions to the existing literature. Firstly, it emphasizes that food sovereignty should be seen as an integral component of transforming food systems towards sustainability, rather than a complete departure from neoliberal food systems. Secondly, it highlights the importance of adopting a multi-scalar approach, where decisions and policies for transforming food systems are context-specific and tailored to local circumstances. Lastly, the paper recognizes the necessity of institutional transformations that involve nation-states, social movements, and civil society organizations as key actors in the process of food system transformation. By reframing the discussion on food sovereignty and its relationship with food security, this paper provides insights into how these concepts can be mutually reinforcing, leading to more sustainable and equitable food systems.
Funder
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Lund University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference146 articles.
1. Agarwal, Bina. 2014. Food sovereignty, food security and democratic choice: Critical contradictions, difficult conciliations. Journal of Peasant Studies 41: 1247–1268.
2. Alberdi, Goiuri, Mirene Begiristain Zubillaga, Zoe Brent, Gérard Choplin, Priscilla Claeys, Mauro Conti, Alessandra Corrado, Jessica Duncan, Tomaso Ferrando, and Nora McKeon. 2020. A collective response from food sovereignty scholars on the EU’s Farm to Fork Strategy.
3. Altieri, Miguel A. 2010. Agroecology versus Ecoagriculture: balancing food production and biodiversity conservation in the midst of social inequity: IUCN, The World Conservation Union, CEESP.
4. Altieri, Miguel A. 2009. Agroecology, small farms, and food sovereignty. Monthly Review 61: 102–113.
5. Altieri, Miguel A., and Clara I. Nicholls. 2008. Scaling up agroecological approaches for food sovereignty in Latin America. Development 51: 472–480.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献