Abstract
AbstractThe aim of this paper is to take normative aspects of animal welfare in corporate practice from a blind spot into the spotlight, and thus connect the fields of business ethics and animal ethics. Using insights from business ethics and animal ethics, it argues that companies have a strong responsibility towards animals. Its rationale is that animals have a moral status, that moral actors have the moral obligation to take the interests of animals into account and thus, that as moral actors, companies should take the interests of animals into account, more specifically their current and future welfare. Based on this corporate responsibility, categories of corporate impact on animals in terms of welfare and longevity are offered, including normative implications for each of them. The article concludes with managerial implications for several business sectors, including the most animal-consuming and animal-welfare-threatening industry: the food sector. Welfare issues are discussed, including the issue of killing for food production.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference116 articles.
1. Akhtar, S. 2011. Animal pain and welfare: Can pain sometimes be worse for them than for us? In The Oxford handbook of animal ethics, ed. T.L. Beauchamp and R.G. Frey, 701–724. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Amos, N., and R. Sullivan. 2018. The business benchmark on farm animal welfare; 2017 report. London: BBFAW.
3. Balcombe, J. 2009. Animal pleasure and its moral significance. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 118: 208–216.
4. Bateson, P. 1991. Assessment of pain in animals. Animal Behaviour 42 (5): 827–839.
5. Bateson, M., S. Desire, S. Gartside, and G. Wright. 2011. Agitated honeybees exhibit pessimistic cognitive biases. Current Biology 21: 1070–1073.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献