Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Aaltola, E. 2019. The meat paradox, omnivore’s akrasia and animal ethics. Animals 9 (12): 1125.
2. Arganini, C., A. Saba, R. Comitato, F. Virgili, and A. Turrini. 2012. Gender Differences in Food choice and dietary intake in Modern Western Societies. In Public Health, Social and Behavioral Health, ed. J. Maddock. New York: Books on Demand.
3. Bastian, B., and S. Loughnan. 2016. Resolving the meat paradox, a motivational account of morally troublesome behaviour and its maintenance. Personality and Social Psychological Review 21 (3): 278–299.
4. Borcsa, M. 2016. Latent Meaning Structures in Couple Relations, Introducing Objective Hermeneutics into Systemic Therapy Research. In Research Perspectives in Couple Therapy, ed. M. Borcsa and P. Rober. Heidelberg: Springer.
5. Brehm, J.W., and A.R. Cohen. 1962. Explorations in cognitive dissonance. New York: John Wiley.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献