Abstract
AbstractThe challenges to designing and implementing ethically and politically meaningful eating policies are many and complex. This article provides a brief overview of Anne Barnhill and Matteo Bonotti’s Healthy Eating Policy and Political Philosophy: A Public Reason Approach while also critically engaging with the place of racial justice, global interconnectedness, and debates over science in thinking about ethics and politics of public health nutrition and policy. I do not aim to burden Barnhill and Bonotti with the responsibility to fully address these issues, but considering the interconnection of these issues and the ever pressing effects of climate change on local and global food systems, we collectively need to turn to these difficult and pressing questions about what a just food system looks like, what concerns are centred, and who is left out. I group these engagements with Barnhill and Bonotti under three headings: racial liberalism, global food system, and contested nutrition science. I conclude with some remarks about locality.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference73 articles.
1. Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2015. The future of whiteness. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2. Anderson, Warwick. 2002. The cultivation of whiteness: Science, health and racial destiny in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
3. Barnhill, Anne, and Matteo Bonotti. 2021. Healthy eating policy and political philosophy: A public reason approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Baum, Fran, Angela Lawless, Toni Delany, Colin Macdougall, Carmel Williams, Danny Broderick, Deborah Wildgoose, Elizabeth Harris, Dennis Mcdermott, and Ilona Kickbusch. 2014. Evaluation of health in all policies: Concept, theory and application. Health Promotion International 29 (suppl_1): i130–i142.
5. Biltekoff, Charlotte. 2013. Eating right in America: The cultural politics of food and health. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献