Abstract
AbstractIn line with the Matthew-effect in reading, reading comprehension and leisure time reading tend to be reciprocally related. Whereas prior research invested much efforts in the identification and description of variables explaining individual differences in reading comprehension, less efforts were spend on the exploration of variables important for the development of leisure time reading. This study focuses on family literacy activities in preschool age – joint book reading, joint library visits, and the teaching of letters – and how these relate to the children’ s later leisure time reading and reading comprehension. Furthermore, the role of parents’ education is considered. Empirical findings are based on a sample of N = 1.242 children from the National Education Panel Study (NEPS). Joint book reading and joint library visits in families, both aspects of informal literacy activities, predicted leisure time reading of children in Grade 4, which was related to their reading comprehension. In addition, disparities with regard to parents’ education were found. The results are discussed against the background of ways to promote children’s leisure time reading and practical implications are derived.
Funder
Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Education,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference63 articles.
1. Albright, M., Delecki, K., & Hinkle, S. (2009). The evolution of early literacy. A history of best practices in storytimes. Children and Libraries, 7, 13–18.
2. Allen, M. S., Iliescu, D., & Greiff, S. (2022). Single item measures in psychological science. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000699.
3. Aßmann, C., Steinhauer, H. W., Würbach, A., Zinn, S., Hammon, A., Kiesl, H., & Blossfeld, H. P. (2019). Sampling designs of the National Educational Panel Study: setup and panel development. In H. P. Blossfeld, & H. G. Roßbach (Eds.), Education as a lifelong process: the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) (pp. 35–55). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23162-0_3.
4. Baker, L., & Scher, D. (2002). Beginning readers’ motivation for reading in relation to parental beliefs and home reading experiences. Reading Psychology, 23, 239–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/713775283.
5. Baker, L., Scher, D., & Mackler, K. (1997). Home and family influences on motivations for reading. Educational Psychologist, 32, 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3202_2.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献