The effect of efficient professional development on the teaching of code-focused skills in beginner readers: exploring the impact of professional development intensity and coaching on student outcomes
-
Published:2022-02-10
Issue:7
Volume:35
Page:1711-1730
-
ISSN:0922-4777
-
Container-title:Reading and Writing
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Read Writ
Author:
Martínez VerónicaORCID, Castejón LuisORCID, González-Pumariega SoledadORCID
Abstract
AbstractProfessional development (PD) of teachers working with students in the first years of learning to read is a privileged way of preventing initial reading difficulties and its effects in the long and short term. This research studies the effects of PD in student reading performance, although the results are not conclusive with regard to which PD format is more adequate. The objective of this study is to determine which modality (face-to-face with a coach vs. without a coach) and intensity (number of contact hours) of PD are more efficient in achieving fluency improvement in student performance in the code-focussed skills in the first years of learning to read. Both pre-schoolers and their teachers took part in the study with a quasi-experimental pre-test post-test design. The experimental group (n = 71) was provided literacy instruction from teachers (n = 8) who received 40 h of face-to-face training with a coach and the control group (n = 29) was provided literacy instruction from teachers (n = 8) who received only 8 h of initial training (without coaching). The results showed significant intra-group improvements with a large reduction in students at risk for reading difficulties. No significant differences were obtained between groups in reading performance. This suggests greater efficiency in a lower intensity format of PD without a coach in the development of code-focussed skills. The study considers the need to adequately assess reading ability in the light of attitude and motivation of teachers as variables which influence the efficiency of PD.
Funder
University of Oviedo Universidad de Oviedo
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Education,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference39 articles.
1. Artiles, C., & Jiménez, J. E. (2011). Normativización de instrumentos para la detección e identificación de las necesidades educativas del alumnado con trastornos por déficit de atención con o sin hiperactividad (TDAH) o alumnado con dificultades específicas de aprendizaje (DEA). Universidades, Cultura y Deportes. 2. Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A. S., & Dexter, E. R. (2010). Assessing the value-added effects of literacy collaborative professional development on student learning. The Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/653468 3. Brady, S., Gillis, M., Smith, T., Lavalette, M., Liss-Bronstein, L., Lowe, E., North, W., Russo, E., & Wilder, T. D. (2009). First grade teachers’ knowledge of phonological awareness and code concepts: Examining gains from an intensive form of professional development and corresponding teacher attitudes. Reading and Writing, 22(4), 425–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9166-x 4. Brownell, M., Kiely, M. T., Haager, D., Boardman, A., Corbett, N., Algina, J., Dingle, P., & Urbach, J. (2017). Literacy learning cohorts: Content-focused approach to improving special education teachers’ reading instruction. Exceptional Children, 83(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916671517 5. Castejón, L. A., González-Pumariega, S., & Cuetos, A. (2019). Enseñar fluidez lectora en el aula: de la investigación a la práctica (Teaching reading fluency in the classroom: From research to practice). Ocnos: Revista de Estudios sobre Lectura, 18(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2019.18.2.1961
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|