Women in the Top of the Income Distribution: What Can We Learn From LIS-Data?

Author:

Bobilev Roman,Boschini Anne,Roine JesperORCID

Abstract

Abstract We explore the extent to which LIS-data can be used to shed light on the presence of women in the top of the income distribution. We show developments of the share of women in top groups (P90-100 and P99-100) of the labour income distribution for 28 countries and, when possible, compare to outcomes when including capital incomes. These turn out not to matter much for the share of women in top groups with some important exceptions. Relating our findings to the existing evidence on women in the top of the income distribution based on aggregate tax data, we find that LIS-data give a relatively accurate picture of the basic findings. However, we also note that once we divide the top1 group further, samples quickly become too small to allow further study. For countries where data allows such analysis, we find that having a partner and having children are positively associated with being in top income groups for men, but negatively associated for women. However, time interactions suggest that these differences have decreased over time. Also, top income men are more likely to have partners who are not in the top of the income distribution while this is not the case for top income women. All these results are surprisingly consistent across country groups.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference59 articles.

1. Aaberge R, Atkinson AB, Königs S (2018a) From classes to copulas: wages, capital, and top incomes. J Econ Inequal 16(2):295–320

2. Aaberge R, Thori Lind J, Moene K (2018) The inequality of equal mating. In: Working Paper, University of Oslo

3. Adema W, Clarke C, Frey V (2015) Paid parental leave: lessons from OECD countries and selected US states. In: OECD social, employment and migration working papers 172

4. Albrecht J, Björklund A, Vroman S (2003) Is there a glass ceiling in Sweden? J Labour Econ 21:145–177

5. Albrecht J, Skogman Thoursie P, Vroman S (2015) Parental leave and the glass ceiling in Sweden. Res Labour Econ 41:89–114

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3