On Navigating Analytical Choices in Research on Early Life Adversity: A Commentary on Sisitsky et al. (2023)

Abstract

AbstractEarly life adversities (ELA), including exposure to childhood maltreatment, deprivation or community violence, rarely occur in isolation. This co-occurrence poses several conceptual and methodological challenges for researchers, who must decide how best to model ELA and its association with outcomes. In this commentary, we discuss how different analytical choices come with their own – often complementary – sets of assumptions, strengths and limitations, which should be carefully considered when designing research on ELA. We then summarize work published in this issue by Sisitsky et al. (Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 2023), which serves as an important example of how different approaches can be incorporated in research in order to capture ELA as a complex phenomenon, while generating actionable results. Ultimately, such integration can enhance the quality and relevance of research, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of ELA and its effects on health outcomes, paving the way for more targeted prevention and intervention strategies to promote children’s wellbeing.