Abstract
Abstract
The European Union guides its member states to a gradual uptake of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) from 2% vol. in 2025 to 63% vol. by 2050 with the ReFuelEU proposal as part of the Fit-for-55 package. A promising production pathway for SAF presents itself in the Power Biomass to Liquid (PBtL) process, which converts non-crop-based biomass residue and renewable power via the Fischer–Tropsch route. In this study, a techno-economic and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission analysis of a small-scale (50 MWth) PBtL process concept, developed in the EU project FLEXCHX, is presented. The analysis is conducted with a thermodynamic process model implemented in Aspen Plus®, which relies on experimental project data. For the PBtL base case production costs of 1.09 €2020/l are estimated, whereby electricity and investment into the alkaline electrolyzer constitute the largest cost drivers. At low electricity prices (< 39.2 €/MWh), the PBtL process is more cost effective than the reference process Biomass to Liquid (BtL). To identify improvements to the base case design, different design options are considered under varying economic boundary conditions: Solid oxide electrolysis is more economic than alkaline electrolysis at higher electricity prices due to its higher system efficiency. Maximizing the product yield by increased CO2 recycling is only economically reasonable below an electricity price threshold, which is found at 20 €/MWh for the base case. Further, PBtL is heavily dependent upon the availability of low GHG electricity in order to produce SAF with a low carbon footprint. Assuming full utilization of the EU’s non-crop-based biomass residues, the EU jet fuel demand for 2030 could be met with the PBtL process.
Funder
EU
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference71 articles.
1. European Commission (2019) The European green deal. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:b828d165-1c22-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1.0002.02/DOC_1&format=PDF. Accessed 17 Jan 2023
2. European Commission (2021) Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council on ensuring a level playing field for sustainable air transport. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/refueleu_aviation_-_sustainable_aviation_fuels.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2023
3. The White House (2021) Biden administration advances the future of sustainable fuels in American aviation. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/09/09/fact-sheet-biden-administration-advances-the-future-of-sustainable-fuels-in-american-aviation/#:~:text=Current%20levels%20of%20domestic%20SAF,driving%20domestic%20innovation%20and%20deployment. Accessed 17 Jan 2023
4. Shahriar MF, Khanal A (2022) The current techno-economic, environmental, policy status and perspectives of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). Fuel 325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124905
5. Ail SS, Dasappa S (2016) Biomass to liquid transportation fuel via Fischer Tropsch synthesis–technology review and current scenario. Renew Sust Energy Rev 58:267–286
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献