Criticism and conversational texts: rhetorical bases of role, audience, and style in the Buber-Rogers dialogue-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Criticism and conversational texts: rhetorical bases of role, audience, and style in the Buber-Rogers dialogue

Published:1996-01 Issue:1 Volume:19 Page:85-118
ISSN:0163-8548
Container-title:Human Studies
language:en
Short-container-title:Hum Stud

Author:

Anderson Rob,Cissna Kenneth N.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy,Sociology and Political Science

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00142857.pdf

Reference89 articles.

1. Anderson, R. (1982). Phenomenological dialogue, humanistic psychology and pseudo-walls: A response and extension. Western Journal of Speech Communication 46(4): 344?357.

2. Anderson, R., Cissna, K.N. and Arnett, R.C. (Eds). (1994). The reach of dialogue: Confirmation, voice, and community. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

3. Arnett, R.C. (1981). Toward a phenomenological dialogue. Western Journal of Speech Communication 45(3): 201?212.

4. Arnett, R.C. (1986). Communication and community: Implications of Martin Buber's dialogue. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

5. Arnett, R.C. (1989). What is dialogic communication?: Friedman's contribution and clarification. Person-Centered Review 4(1): 42?60.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Public relations, indigeneity and colonization: Indigenous resistance as dialogic anchor;Public Relations Review;2020-03

2. Introduction;Dialogue Studies;2015

3. Dialogue and the Prospect of Rhetoric;Review of Communication;2012-01

4. Self-Assessment as a Dilemmatic Communicative Practice: Talk among Psychics in Training;Southern Communication Journal;2010-08-31

5. Hans-Georg Gadamer'sPraxis: Implications for Connection and Action in Communication Studies;Communication, Culture & Critique;2009-09