Encouraging multiple forms of scholarship in faculty reward systems: Does It Make a Difference?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Encouraging multiple forms of scholarship in faculty reward systems: Does It Make a Difference?

Published:2005-08 Issue:5 Volume:46 Page:479-510
ISSN:0361-0365
Container-title:Research in Higher Education
language:en
Short-container-title:Res High Educ

Author:

O’Meara Kerry Ann

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11162-005-3362-6.pdf

Reference40 articles.

1. “Upward Drift” is Alive and Well:Research/Doctoral Model Still Attractive to Institutions

2. Austenson, R. A. (1997). Faculty relations and professional development: Best practices for the chief academic officer. In: Martin, J., Samels, J., and Associates (eds.), First Among Equals: The Role of the Chief Academic Officer. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

3. Boice, R. (1992). The New Faculty Member. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

Cited by 66 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. From mandate to co-create: leading the development of inclusive performance evaluation criteria;Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal;2024-07-24

2. Interdisciplinary Research, Tenure Review, and Guardians of the Disciplinary Order;The Journal of Higher Education;2024-01-18

3. “A Broader Audience to Affect Change?”: How Education Faculty Conceptualize “Audience” When Producing Public Scholarship;Innovative Higher Education;2023-11-30

4. Implementing pluralistic models of scholarly impact in business schools with performance management principles to meet stakeholder expectations;Quality Assurance in Education;2023-10-12

5. Chilean and Finnish university-based teacher educators’ agentic approaches to academic career path development;Higher Education Research & Development;2023-08-16