Abstract
AbstractChotoy spinetail Schoeniophylax phryganophilus is widely distributed in southern and eastern South America. What was believed to be a geographically disjunct population was described, as S. p. petersi, from eastern Brazil, in the valley of the Rio São Francisco, in northern Minas Gerais and western Bahia, based on comparatively minor plumage characters (chiefly colour and strength of the streaking). Its range was subsequently believed to extend to the northeast Brazilian state of Piauí. We analysed a total of 91 specimens of Schoeniophylax (74 S. p. phryganophilus, 17 S. p. petersi) for external morphology (plumage and biometrics), and 27 recordings of the species’ main song (22 S. p. phryganophilus and five S. p. petersi). We found no evidence to support intraspecific geographical variation, which is unsurprising in the light of vastly increased fieldwork that has removed any obvious disjunction in the distribution of Schoeniophylax, and we therefore recommend that the species be returned to monotypy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. BirdLife International (2016) Schoeniophylax phryganophilus. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2016:e.T22702276A93866427. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22702276A93866427.en. Accessed 1 Apr 2023
2. Brammer F (2002) Species concepts and conservation priorities: a study of birds in north-east Brazil. MSc Thesis, Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen
3. Canevari M, Canevari P, Carrizo GR, Harris G, Rodriguez Mata J, Straneck RJ (1991) Nueva guía de las aves Argentinas, 2 vols. Fundación Acindar, Buenos Aires
4. Claramunt S (2014) Phylogenetic relationships among Synallaxini spinetails (Aves: Furnariidae) reveal a new biogeographic pattern across the Amazon and Paraná river basins. Mol Phylogenet Evol 78:223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.05.011
5. Cracraft J (1985) Historical biogeography and patterns of differentiation within the South American avifauna: areas of endemism. In: Buckley PA, Foster MS, Morton ES, Ridgely RS, Buckley FG (eds) Neotropical ornithology. Ornithol Monogr 36:49–84