Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The objective of this study is to estimate the price of retribution.
Methods
Based on administrative data on all sentences in the Netherlands in 2012 and recidivism from 2012 to 2018, we first investigate whether community service orders are more effective in reducing recidivism than short-term imprisonment using an instrumental variable approach. Next, we compute the cost savings that could be obtained by replacing short-term prison sanctions with equivalent community service orders.
Results
We find that short-term prison sanctions lead to an increase in recidivism and an increase in the costs of sanctioning. We find that Dutch society pays about 400 million euros per year for retribution. This is about 21,000 euros per sanctioned offense per year and about 45 euros per taxpayer per year in the Netherlands. This is most likely a lower bound.
Conclusions
Our study reveals the willingness to pay for retribution as implied by judicial choices.
Funder
The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
Gratama Stichting
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference93 articles.
1. Abrams, D. S. (2012). The imprisoner’s dilemma: A cost-benefit approach to incarceration. Iowa Law Review, 98, 905–970.
2. Aebi, M. F., Berger-Kolopp, L., Burkhardt, C., & Tiago, M. M. (2019). Prisons in Europe 2005-2015 – Volume 1: Country profiles. Council of Europe.
3. Andersen, L. H. (2019). Using a natural experiment to measure the impact of swifter punishment on criminal recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 16, 289–298.
4. Anderson, D. (1999). The aggregate burden of crime. The Journal of Law and Economics, 42(2), 611–642.
5. Angrist, J. D. (2006). Instrumental variables methods in experimental criminological research: What, why and how. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 23–44.