Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Investigate how the threat of a possible felony conviction affects defendants’ willingness to accept a plea (WTAP) and whether perceptions of collateral consequences explain this influence.
Methods
We use a nationwide (N=659) vignette experiment which manipulated 1) guilt and 2) plea offer charge reduction (felony or misdemeanor) to determine their effect on WTAP. Respondents were also asked to rank the relative importance of common collateral consequences in their decision to plea (or not).
Results
A felony probation plea offer, relative to a misdemeanor probation offer, was associated with lower WTAP. Perceptions of collateral consequences did not account for this “felony effect” on WTAP.
Conclusions
While people want to avoid the “mark” of a felony conviction, it is not necessarily due to fear of specific collateral consequences; instead, it appears that people want to avoid the stigmatizing label.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of research in personality, 25(3), 285–301.
2. Bibas, S. (2004). Plea bargaining outside the shadow of the trial. Harvard Law Review, 117(8), 2463–2547.
3. Bordens, K. S. (1984). The effects of likelihood of conviction, threatened punishment, and assumed role on mock plea-bargaining decisions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 5(1), 59–74.
4. Bushway, S. (2019). Defendant decision-making in plea bargains. V., Edkins, A. Redlich,(Eds.), A system of pleas: Social science's contributions to the real legal system, pp. 24-36.
5. Dervan, L. E., & Edkins, V. A. (2013). The innocent defendant’s dilemma: An innovative empirical study of plea bargaining’s innocence problem. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 103(1), 1–48.