Abstract
Abstract Exploiting quasi-random assignment to NYC arraignment judges with varying propensities to detain, we use a judge fixed effect instrumental variable approach to estimate the impact of pretrial detention on several case outcomes: guilty plea, conviction, and carceral sentence. We find that any period of pretrial detention increases the likelihood of a guilty plea by 23 percentage points, a conviction by 24 percentage points, and a carceral sentence by 35 percentage points. Stratified analyses show differences in the size of the effect by charge severity and race: felony defendants experienced a larger effect on all case outcomes; non-Black defendants experienced a larger effect on guilty pleas and convictions; and Black defendants experienced a larger effect on carceral sentences.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Krueger, A. B. (1999). Jackknife instrumental variables estimation. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14(1), 57–67.
2. Angrist, J. D. (2006). Instrumental variables methods in experimental criminological research: What, why and how. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2(1), 23–44.
3. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics. Princeton University Press.
4. Ares, C. E., Rankin, A., & Sturz, H. (1963). The Manhattan Bail Project: An interim report on the use of pre-trial parole. New York University Law Review, 38, 67–95.
5. Aronow, P. M., & Carnegie, A. (2013). Beyond LATE: Estimation of the average treatment effect with an instrumental variable. Political Analysis, 21(4), 492–506.