Abstract
AbstractIn clinical research, the initial efficacy of a new agent is typically assessed in a phase IIA study. Bayesian group-sequential designs are often based on predictive probability of trial success. In this paper, the novel Bayesian group-sequential predictive evidence value design is introduced, and we prove that the predictive probability approach is a special case of it. A comparison with Simon’s two-stage and competing Bayesian designs based on phase IIA cancer trials is provided. Results show that the novel design can improve operating characteristics such as the false-positive rate, probability of early stopping for futility and expected sample size of the trial. Given these advantages, the predictive evidence value design constitutes an important addition to the biostatistician’s toolbelt when planning a phase IIA trial the Bayesian way, in particular, when small sample sizes and a large probability for early termination under the null hypothesis are desired.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. Berry SM (2011) Bayesian adaptive methods for clinical trials. CRC Press, Boca Raton
2. Casella G, Berger RL (2002) Statistical inference. Thomson Learning, Stamford
3. Diniz M, Pereira CAB, Polpo A, Stern JM, Wechsler S (2012) Relationship between Bayesian and frequentist significance indices. Int J Uncertain Quantif 2(2):161–172
4. Dmitrienko A, Wang MD (2006) Bayesian predictive approach to interim monitoring in clinical trials. Stat Med 25(13):2178–2195. https://doi.org/10.1002/SIM.2204
5. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Verweij J (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJCA.2008.10.026