Author:
Weith Helena,Matt Christian
Abstract
AbstractWhile voice agent product recommendations (VAPR) can be convenient for users, their underlying artificial intelligence (AI) components are subject to recommendation engine opacities and audio-based constraints, which limit users’ information level when conducting purchase decisions. As a result, users might feel as if they are being treated unfairly, which can lead to negative consequences for retailers. Drawing from the information processing and stimulus-organism-response theory, we investigate through two experimental between-subjects studies how process explanations and process visualizations—as additional information provision measures—affect users’ perceived fairness and behavioral responses to VAPRs. We find that process explanations have a positive effect on fairness perceptions, whereas process visualizations do not. Process explanations based on users’ profiles and their purchase behavior show the strongest effects in improving fairness perceptions. We contribute to the literature on fair and explainable AI by extending the rather algorithm-centered perspectives by considering audio-based VAPR constraints and directly linking them to users’ perceptions and responses. We inform practitioners how they can use information provision measures to avoid unjustified perceptions of unfairness and adverse behavioral responses.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Marketing,Computer Science Applications,Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management
Reference94 articles.
1. Abdul, A., Vermeulen, J., Wang, D., Li, B.Y., & Kankanhalli, M. (2018). Trends and trajectories for explainable, accountable and intelligible systems: An HCI research agenda. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174156
2. Angerschmid, A., Zhou, J., Theuermann, K., Chen, F., & Holzinger, A. (2022). Fairness and explanation in AI-informed decision making. Machine Learning & Knowledge Extraction, 4, 556–579. https://doi.org/10.3390/make4020026
3. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2, 89–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3
4. Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2021). Fairness in machine learning – Limitations and opportunities. Nips Tutorial, 1, pp. 1–249. Retrieved July 7, 2022, from https://fairmlbook.org/
5. Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, 104(671), 671–732. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38BG31
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献