Abstract
AbstractEngagement platforms (EPs) are an essential technology to enable co-creation and service innovation. Therefore, the design and governance of these platforms are receiving increasing attention in research. In this study, we aim to identify which activities and mechanisms foster engagement and which governance mechanisms are implemented to avoid harm on EPs. To this end, we conducted expert interviews with founders, CEOs, and managers of 14 personal and household-related service platform companies from the DACH region (Germany(D), Austria(A), Switzerland(CH)), to gain insights into their activities and mechanisms for creating and maintaining successful EPs. We found eight mechanisms, e.g., moderation of content, limitations of entry and certification, employed by personal EPs (PEPs) as self-regulatory mechanisms to avoid misconduct and negative experiences of actors. The identified governance mechanisms may guide the design and governing of PEPs by providing tangible examples to foster actor engagement while considering externalities on a societal and individual level.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Marketing,Computer Science Applications,Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management
Reference96 articles.
1. Akaka, M. A., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Technology as an operant resource in service (eco)systems. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(3), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-021-00524-5
2. Aulkemeier, F., Iacob, M.-E., & van Hillegersberg, J. (2019). Platform-based collaboration in digital ecosystems. Electronic Markets, 29(4), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00341-2
3. Bazarhanova, A., Yli-Huumo, J., & Smolander, K. (2020). From platform dominance to weakened ownership: How external regulation changed Finnish e-identification. Electronic Markets, 30(3), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00331-4
4. Bidar, R., Watson, J., & Barros, A. (2016). Literature review to determine environmental and cognitive factors underlying user value cocreation behaviour. Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Chiayi. 327. http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2016/327
5. Bitner, M. J., Brown, S. W., & Meuter, M. L. (2000). Technology infusion in service encounters. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281013
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献