Abstract
AbstractSocial Welfare Computing is an emerging discipline that seeks to direct technology to cause minimum societal disruption, and in particular seeks to minimize the harm caused directly by technology itself. This is markedly different from the better-understood uses of technology to create value or to address existing social needs. Innovative technologies that are widely adopted created significant value for their users; otherwise, they would not be widely adopted. Often the companies that create them obtain new sources of wealth and power, which inevitably lead to new forms of abuse of power and new forms of societal disruption. Societal disruption in turn requires social adaptation, including new regulations to influence the behavior of firms and to define and to protect the rights of individuals in the changed society. The governance of online business models is complex because regulators must meet the conflicting objectives of different segments of society, and because regulators must avoid imposing restrictions that stifle innovation. Social Welfare Computing seeks to guide social adaptation, combining insights from disciplines as varied as anthropology, business strategy, economics, strategic planning, and law.
Funder
Technische Universität München
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Marketing,Computer Science Applications,Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management
Reference154 articles.
1. Abramowicz, W., Hahn, A., Ludwig, A., & Stróżyna, M. (2020). Information Systems in Intermodal Transportation and Traffic Management. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 62, 401–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00662-z.
2. Alarid, M. (2016). Recruitment and radicalization: The role of social media and new technology. In M. Hughes & m. Miklaucic (Eds.), Impunity: Countering illicit power in war and transition. Center for Complex Operations (CCO) and the Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute (PKSOI), USA.
3. Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211.
4. Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2020). The welfare effects of social media. American Economic Review, 110(3), 629–676. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190658.
5. Allyn, B., Bond, S., & Lucas, R. (2020). Google abuses its monopoly power over search, Justice Department Says In Lawsuit. NPR. Retrieved 22.11.2021 from https://www.npr.org/2020/10/20/925736276/google-abuses-its-monopoly-power-over-search-justice-department-says-in-lawsuit?t=1611264083812.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献