Author:
Geisenberger Dorothee,Große Perdekamp Markus,Glardon Matthieu,Kromeier Jan,Pollak Stefan,Thierauf-Emberger Annette
Abstract
AbstractIn conventional gunshot injuries to targets containing bone the resulting osseous fragments do not precede but follow the bullet on its further way through adjacent soft tissues. The term “secondary projectiles” for the particles does not appear to be appropriate since they are not believed to have enough energy necessary for creating their own wound channels away from the temporary cavity. Former studies have shown that in angled shots to glass panes the bulk of splinters does not follow the bullet’s trajectory: The majority of the glass fragments, especially the larger ones, move at right angles to the pane shot through. The aim of the presented study was to examine whether osseous fragments behave like glass splinters in angled shots to flat synthetic bone. In this context, it should also be assessed, whether the bone fragments might act as secondary projectiles in rare cases. To answer these questions, test shots were fired to composite models consisting of flat synthetic bone and ballistic gelatin. Pistol cartridges 9 mm Luger were used to fire the shots which were video-documented with a high-speed camera. Afterwards, the composite models underwent CT examination and macroscopic inspection. Video-documentation revealed that the larger bone particles from the perforation site move at a roughly right angle from the osseous sheet into the gelatin, causing an eccentric bulge of the temporary cavity. The smaller bone fragments were also lodged along the bullet’s path, predominantly in the cracks radiating from the permanent wound channel.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Rothschild MA (2022) Conventional forensic medicine. In: Kneubuehl BP (ed) Wound ballistics. Basics and applications, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 263–299
2. Huelke DF, Buege LJ, Harger JH (1967) Bone fractures produced by high velocity impacts. Am J Anat 120:123–132
3. Bartlett CS (2003) Clinical update: gunshot wound ballistics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 408:28–57
4. Molde Å, Gray R (1995) High-velocity gunshot wound through bone with low energy transfer. Letter to the editor. Injury 26(2):131
5. DiMaio VJM (2016) Gunshot wounds. Practical aspects of firearms, ballistics, and forensic techniques, 3rd edn. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 99–102