Abstract
Abstract
Timing bone fractures is one of the main tasks of a forensic anthropologist, but still an uncertain diagnostic. In the literature, there are many macroscopic methods to distinguish perimortem from postmortem fractures, based on the distinct structural and mechanical properties of fresh and dry bones. However, this differentiation is still challenging, in particular when the bones are fragmented or still exhibit fresh properties. Although histologic analysis is often used as a complementary diagnostic tool in forensic pathology, its application in the evaluation of bone fractures is uncommon. The aim of this study was to investigate whether fractures of fresh bones reveal a distinct microcracking pattern compared to fractures of dry bones, in order to optimise the fracture timing. To this purpose, we histologically analysed perimortem and postmortem fractures in human humeri. The fresh bones were retrieved from traumatic autopsy cases, and the dry bones from donors which were experimentally fractured. Our results showed that the highest density and length of microcracks (MCKs) were found in the interstitial area of dry fractured bones, which may be considered a marker of postmortem damage. In fresh fractured bones, we generally observed a lower density of MCKs, but a higher proportion of osteonal MCKs, which may be considered a marker of perimortem trauma. In summary, the results of our exploratory study suggest that changes in intrinsic bone factors (mineral/organic components) result in a different microcracking pattern that can be used in fracture timing.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference33 articles.
1. Galloway A, Zephro L, Wedel VL (2014) Diagnostic criteria for the determination of timing and fracture mechanism. In: Wedel VL, Galloway A (eds) Broken Bones: Anthropological Analysis of Blunt Force Trauma. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, pp 47–58
2. Christensen AM, Passalacqua NV, Bartelink EJ (2014) Forensic anthropology: current methods and practice. Academic Press, Oxford
3. Cappella A, Amadasi A, Castoldi E, Mazarelli D, Gaudio D, Cattaneo C (2014) The difficult task of assessing perimortem and postmortem fractures on the skeleton: a blind text on 210 fractures of known origin. J Forensic Sci 59:1598–1601
4. Symes SA, L’Abbé EN, Stull KE, Lacroix M, Pokines JT (2014) Chapter 13: taphonomy and the timing of bone fractures in trauma analysis. In: Pokines JT, Symes SA (eds) Manual of forensic taphonomy. CRC Press, Florida, pp 341–365
5. Symes SA, L’Abbé EN, Chapman EN, Wolff I, Dirkmaat DC (2012) Chapter 17: interpreting traumatic injury to bone in medicolegal investigations. In: Dirkmaat DC (ed) A companion to forensic anthropology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 340–388
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献