Microcracking pattern in fractured bones: new approach for distinguishing between peri- and postmortem fractures

Author:

Winter-Buchwalder MichelleORCID,Schwab NathalieORCID,Galtés IgnasiORCID,Ortega-Sánchez MarisaORCID,Scheirs SarahORCID,Jordana XavierORCID

Abstract

Abstract Timing bone fractures is one of the main tasks of a forensic anthropologist, but still an uncertain diagnostic. In the literature, there are many macroscopic methods to distinguish perimortem from postmortem fractures, based on the distinct structural and mechanical properties of fresh and dry bones. However, this differentiation is still challenging, in particular when the bones are fragmented or still exhibit fresh properties. Although histologic analysis is often used as a complementary diagnostic tool in forensic pathology, its application in the evaluation of bone fractures is uncommon. The aim of this study was to investigate whether fractures of fresh bones reveal a distinct microcracking pattern compared to fractures of dry bones, in order to optimise the fracture timing. To this purpose, we histologically analysed perimortem and postmortem fractures in human humeri. The fresh bones were retrieved from traumatic autopsy cases, and the dry bones from donors which were experimentally fractured. Our results showed that the highest density and length of microcracks (MCKs) were found in the interstitial area of dry fractured bones, which may be considered a marker of postmortem damage. In fresh fractured bones, we generally observed a lower density of MCKs, but a higher proportion of osteonal MCKs, which may be considered a marker of perimortem trauma. In summary, the results of our exploratory study suggest that changes in intrinsic bone factors (mineral/organic components) result in a different microcracking pattern that can be used in fracture timing.

Funder

Universitat de Vic

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference33 articles.

1. Galloway A, Zephro L, Wedel VL (2014) Diagnostic criteria for the determination of timing and fracture mechanism. In: Wedel VL, Galloway A (eds) Broken Bones: Anthropological Analysis of Blunt Force Trauma. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, pp 47–58

2. Christensen AM, Passalacqua NV, Bartelink EJ (2014) Forensic anthropology: current methods and practice. Academic Press, Oxford

3. Cappella A, Amadasi A, Castoldi E, Mazarelli D, Gaudio D, Cattaneo C (2014) The difficult task of assessing perimortem and postmortem fractures on the skeleton: a blind text on 210 fractures of known origin. J Forensic Sci 59:1598–1601

4. Symes SA, L’Abbé EN, Stull KE, Lacroix M, Pokines JT (2014) Chapter 13: taphonomy and the timing of bone fractures in trauma analysis. In: Pokines JT, Symes SA (eds) Manual of forensic taphonomy. CRC Press, Florida, pp 341–365

5. Symes SA, L’Abbé EN, Chapman EN, Wolff I, Dirkmaat DC (2012) Chapter 17: interpreting traumatic injury to bone in medicolegal investigations. In: Dirkmaat DC (ed) A companion to forensic anthropology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 340–388

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3