Abstract
AbstractDifferent studies have established that the mineralization stages of the second mandibular molar can be used in forensic age estimation. Nowadays, the estimate’s accuracy is an ethical concern, producing as few false positives (individuals incorrectly classified as older than a determined threshold) and false negatives (individuals incorrectly classified as younger than a determined threshold) as possible. Some have hypothesized that changes in teeth number may influence tooth mineralization, altering the age estimate process. This paper analyzes whether third molar agenesis affects the second mandibular molar mineralization time frame. To do so, 355 orthopantomograms were evaluated for third molar agenesis, and the second mandibular molar mineralization stage was assessed using the Demirjian stages. Student’s t-test was used to compare the difference in the mean age at which the various stages of 37 mineralization were reached in the groups with and without third molar agenesis. The level of statistical significance was set at 5%. The results pointed to a delay in second mandibular molar mineralization in the case of agenesis, suggesting the need to consider this when estimating age using dental techniques.
Funder
Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior
Universidade do Porto
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference33 articles.
1. Focardi M, Pinchi V, De Luca F, Norelli GA (2014) Age estimation for forensic purposes in Italy: ethical issues. Int J Legal Med 128(3):515–522
2. Rudolf E, Comments to Focardi et al (2015) Age estimation for forensic purposes in Italy: ethical issues. Int J Legal Med 129(6):1271–1273
3. Roberts G, Lucas VS, McDonald F, Camilleri S, Jayaraman J, Davies D, Moze K (2017) In our opinion. Br Dent J 222(12):918–921
4. Hancocks S (2017) Agreed; but if...? Br Dent J 222(1):1
5. Aynsley-Green A (2009) Unethical age assessment. Br Dent J 206(7):337