Abstract
AbstractThe estimation of ancestry is important not only towards establishing identity but also as a required precursor to facilitating the accurate estimation of other attributes such as sex, age at death, and stature. The present study aims to analyze morphological variation in the crania of Japanese and Western Australian individuals and test predictive models based on machine learning for their potential forensic application. The Japanese and Western Australian samples comprise computed tomography (CT) scans of 230 (111 female; 119 male) and 225 adult individuals (112 female; 113 male), respectively. A total of 18 measurements were calculated, and machine learning methods (random forest modeling, RFM; support vector machine, SVM) were used to classify ancestry. The two-way unisex model achieved an overall accuracy of 93.2% for RFM and 97.1% for SVM, respectively. The four-way sex and ancestry model demonstrated an overall classification accuracy of 84.0% for RFM and 93.0% for SVM. The sex-specific models were most accurate in the female samples (♀ 95.1% for RFM and 100% for SVM; ♂91.4% for RFM and 97.4% for SVM). Our findings suggest that cranial measurements acquired in CT images can be used to accurately classify Japanese and Western Australian individuals into their respective population. This is the first study to assess the feasibility of ancestry estimation using three-dimensional CT images of the skull.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Balseven-Odabasi A, Yalcinozan E, Keten A et al (2013) Age and sex estimation by metric measurements and fusion of hyoid bone in a Turkish population. J Forensic Leg Med 20:496–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2013.03.022
2. Ousley S, Jantz R, Freid D (2009) Understanding race and human variation: why are forensic anthropologists are good at identifying race. Am J Phys Anthropol 139:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21006
3. Cunha E, Ubelaker DH (2020) Evaluation of ancestry from human skeletal remains: a concise review. Forensic Sci Res 5:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2019.1697060
4. Byers S (2011) Introduction to Forensic Anthropology, 4th edn. Routledge, Boston
5. Cunha E, Ortega PA (2016) Como los antrop ologos fore-nses evaluan la ancestr ıa? In: Sanabria MC (ed) Patologıa y Antropologıa Forense de la Muerte–La Investigacion Cientıfico Judicial de la Muerte Yla Tortura, desde las Fosas Clandestinas Hasta Laudiencia Publica. Forensic Publisher, Bogot a (Colombia), pp 221–235 Spanish