Abstract
AbstractThe AGFAD (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Forensische Alterdiagnostik, Study Group on Forensic Age Diagnostics) has published several recommendations regarding both technical aspects of computed tomography (CT) of the medial clavicular epiphysis (MCE) and the process of reading and interpreting the CT images for forensic age estimations (FAE). There are, however, no published recommendations regarding CT scan protocols and no dose reference values for CT of the MCE. The objective of this analysis was to assess adherence to AGFAD recommendations among practitioners of FAE and analyse reported dose-relevant CT scan parameters with the objective of helping to establish evidence-based dose reference values for FAE. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and in Google Scholar with specific MeSH terms to identify original research articles on FAE with CT of the MCE from 1997 to 2022. A total of 48 studies were included. Adherence to AGFAD recommendations among practitioners of FAE is high regarding the use of Schmeling main stages (93%), bone window (79%), ≤ 1 mm CT slices (67%), axial/coronal CT images (65%), and Kellinghaus sub-stages (59%). The reporting of CT technique and CT dose-relevant scan parameters is heterogeneous and often incomplete in the current literature. Considering the success achieved by the AGFAD in creating standards of practice of FAE in living subjects, there is potential for the AGFAD to establish standards for radiation protection in FAE as well.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference65 articles.
1. Schmeling A, Grundmann C, Fuhrmann A, Kaatsch HJ, Knell B, Ramsthaler F, Reisinger W, Riepert T, Ritz-Timme S, Rösing FW, Rötzscher K, Geserick G (2008) Criteria for age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0254-2
2. Wittschieber D, Ottow C, Vieth V, Küppers M, Schulz R, Hassu J, Bajanowski T, Püschel K, Ramsthaler F, Pfeiffer H, Schmidt S, Schmeling A (2015) Projection radiography of the clavicle: still recommendable for forensic age diagnostics in living individuals? Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1067-0
3. Schmeling A, Dettmeyer R, Rudolf E, Vieth V, Geserick G (2016) Forensic age estimation. Dtsch Arztebl Int. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2016.0044
4. Arbeitsgruppe für Forensische Altersdiagnostik (AGFAD) (2018) Forensische Altersdiagnostik bei unbegleiteten minderjährigen Flüchtlingen. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Forensische Altersdiagnostik. https://www.dgrm.de/institute/deutschland/essen/stellungnahme-forensische-altersdiagnostik-bei-unbegleiteten-minderjaehrigen-fluechtlingen. Accessed 27 February 2023
5. Schmeling A, Kreitner KF, Heindel W, Vieth V (2019) Imaging methods used for forensic age assessment in juveniles and young adults. Radiologie Up2date. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0795-1838
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献