Abstract
AbstractEstimation of the exposure temperature of skeletal remains can be done by means of colourimetry and a previously published decision model for the colourimetric data, resulting in clusters that represent a range of exposure temperature. The method was based on thermally altered freshly burned human skeletal remains. However, in practice the origin or pre-burning condition of (possibly fragmentary) burned remains can be unknown. Further, in order to use the colourimetric analysis, and accompanying decision model, it is important to have a reference or test set. Fresh human material is not available for this purpose in all countries. Hence, the classification accuracy of the decision model was tested for, in some countries more readily available substitutes for fresh bone; embalmed human bone and non-human bone. The model yielded high accuracies for these sample materials, making it possible to create a reference or test set from fresh non-human and embalmed human bone as substitute for human, and also to use the decision model for these deviating samples in practice.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference21 articles.
1. Shipman P, Foster G, Schoeninger M (1984) Burnt bone and teeth: an experimental study of color, morphology, crystal structure and shrinkage. J Arch Sci 11:307–325
2. Walker PL, Miller KWP (2005) Time, temperature and oxygen availability: an experimental study of the effects of environmental conditions on the color and organic content of cremated bone. Am J Phys Anth 40(222):216–217
3. Walker PL, Miller KWP, Richman R (2008) Time, temperature, and oxygen availability: an experimental study of the effects of environmental conditions on the color and organic content of cremated bone. CW Schmidt and SA Symes, editors the analysis of burned human remains. Elsevier Ltd., London, pp 129–135
4. Krap T et al (2019) Colourimetric analysis of thermally altered human bone samples. Sci Rep 9(1):8923
5. Correia PM (1997) Fire modification of bone: a review of the literature. In: Haglund WD, Sorg MH (eds) Editors forensic taphonomy. CRC, New York, pp 275–293