Author:
Otto Philipp,Fusta Moro Alessandro,Rodeschini Jacopo,Shaboviq Qendrim,Ignaccolo Rosaria,Golini Natalia,Cameletti Michela,Maranzano Paolo,Finazzi Francesco,Fassò Alessandro
Abstract
AbstractThis study presents a comparative analysis of three predictive models with an increasing degree of flexibility: hidden dynamic geostatistical models (HDGM), generalised additive mixed models (GAMM), and the random forest spatiotemporal kriging models (RFSTK). These models are evaluated for their effectiveness in predicting $$\text {PM}_{2.5}$$
PM
2.5
concentrations in Lombardy (North Italy) from 2016 to 2020. Despite differing methodologies, all models demonstrate proficient capture of spatiotemporal patterns within air pollution data with similar out-of-sample performance. Furthermore, the study delves into station-specific analyses, revealing variable model performance contingent on localised conditions. Model interpretation, facilitated by parametric coefficient analysis and partial dependence plots, unveils consistent associations between predictor variables and $$\text {PM}_{2.5}$$
PM
2.5
concentrations. Despite nuanced variations in modelling spatiotemporal correlations, all models effectively accounted for the underlying dependence. In summary, this study underscores the efficacy of conventional techniques in modelling correlated spatiotemporal data, concurrently highlighting the complementary potential of Machine Learning and classical statistical approaches.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference81 articles.
1. Baayen H, Vasishth S, Kliegl R et al (2017) The cave of shadows: addressing the human factor with generalized additive mixed models. J Mem Lang 94:206–234
2. Bai L, Liu Z, Wang J (2022) Novel hybrid extreme learning machine and multi-objective optimization algorithm for air pollution prediction. Appl Math Modell 106:177–198
3. Belgiu M, Drăguţ L (2016) Random forest in remote sensing: a review of applications and future directions. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 114:24–31
4. Berrocal VJ, Guan Y, Muyskens A et al (2020) A comparison of statistical and machine learning methods for creating national daily maps of ambient PM$$_{2.5}$$ concentration. Atmos Environ 222:117,130
5. Bertaccini P, Dukic V, Ignaccolo R (2012) Modeling the short-term effect of traffic and meteorology on air pollution in Turin with generalized additive models. Adv Meteorol 4:8–78
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献