Abstract
AbstractThis paper considers a formalisation of classical logic using general introduction rules and general elimination rules. It proposes a definition of ‘maximal formula’, ‘segment’ and ‘maximal segment’ suitable to the system, and gives reduction procedures for them. It is then shown that deductions in the system convert into normal form, i.e. deductions that contain neither maximal formulas nor maximal segments, and that deductions in normal form satisfy the subformula property. Tarski’s Rule is treated as a general introduction rule for implication. The general introduction rule for negation has a similar form. Maximal formulas with implication or negation as main operator require reduction procedures of a more intricate kind not present in normalisation for intuitionist logic.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference16 articles.
1. Dummett, M.: The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1993)
2. Gentzen, G.: Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. Mathematische Zeitschrift 39, 176–210, 405–431 (1934)
3. Kürbis, N.: Normalisation and Subformula Property for a System of Intuitionist Logic with General Introduction and Elimination Rules (2021) (under review)
4. Milne, P.: Subformula and separation properties in natural deduction via small Kripke models. Rev. Symb. Logic 3(2), 175–227 (2010)
5. Milne, P.: Inversion principles and introduction rules. In: Wansing, H. (ed.) Dag Prawitz on Proofs and Meaning, pp. 189–224. Springer, Cham (2015)
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献