The Precautionary Approach Design Pattern

Author:

Pöysti TuomasORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe precautionary approach is a way to manage problems related to the uncertainty of scientific knowledge regarding potential serious harms and to enable decision-making under uncertainty with due diligence. I have developed a model of the essential structural elements of the application of the precautionary approach, particularly the precautionary principle in EU law, as a legal design pattern—a formalized presentation of the core generic features and processes of how the law successfully addresses recurring problems. The precautionary approach appears as a decision tree with weighting and balancing. It serves as an intervening rule to resolve inter-system conflicts between different action systems such as the economy, civil society, and ecological systems. It is related to other design patterns like the proportionality test, risk and impact assessment, and judicial review. Presenting the application of the precautionary approach as a legal design pattern facilitates interdisciplinary communication regarding the essential features of legally required problem-solving. Such a presentation enhances the problem-solving capacity of the application of the law beyond the legal domain, for instance, in improving digitalization efforts and enabling the integration of anticipatory quality controls of justice, legality and good governance into decision-making processes.

Funder

University of Helsinki

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference85 articles.

1. Akata, Z., Balliet, D., de Rijke, M., Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Eiben, G., Fokkens, A., Schlobach, S., van der Gaag, L., van Harmelen, F., van Hoof, H., Grossi, D., Hindriks, K., Hoos, H., Hung, H., Jonker, C., Monz, C., Neerincx, M., Oliehoek, F., et al. (2020). A research agenda for hybrid intelligence: augmenting human intellect with collaborative, adaptive, responsible, and explainable artificial intelligence. IEEE Computer, 28, 281–326.

2. Alemanno, A. (2011). Case C-79/09, Gowan Comércio internacional e Serviços Lda v. Ministero della Salute, judgment of the court of justice (second chamber) of 22 december 2010. Common Market Law Review, 48(4), 1329–1348.

3. Alemanno, A. (2014). Le juge et les études d’impact. Revue Française D’administration Publique, 149, 179–194.

4. Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building. Oxford University Press.

5. Anderson, C. (2014). Contrasting models of EU administration in judicial review of risk regulation. Common Market Law Review, 51(2), 425–454. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2014033

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3