Abstract
AbstractDevelopment efforts have increased women’s perceived empowerment and freedom, yet have failed to sustainably alter gender norms. There is a lack of research investigating reasons for this anomaly. This study, departing from the conventional approach, tries to fill this gap by employing an interpretative phenomenological approach to assess how women have managed to achieve expanded agency while living within a constraining normative environment. We argue that women have the capacity to deviate and the intentions that lead to new behaviors emerge not only from individuals’ attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control, as suggested by the Theory of Planned Behavior, but also in combination with demographic and economic factors. Individuals need to make decisions in three areas ―self-conviction (attitude and perceived behavioral control), subjective norms (within household and community), and structures (state and non-state institutions). The results shed light on alternative empowerment pathways that could potentially inform the design of transformational interventions.
Funder
This work was supported by the University of New England International Post Graduate Research Award Grant (UNE IPRA) and the Livestock CRP.
University of New England
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference85 articles.
1. UNDP (2018). Human development indices and indicators 2018 statistical update, New York.
2. FAO (2011). The state of food and agriculture. Women in agriculture: Closing the gender gap for development. Rome, Italy: FAO. Retrieved May 29, 2020 from http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i2050e/i2050e.pdf
3. Mahmud, S., & Tasneem, S. (2014). Measuring ‘empowerment’ using quantitative household survey data. Women’s Studies International Forum, 45, 90–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.11.009
4. O’Hara, C., & Clement, F. (2018). Power as agency: A critical reflection on the measurement of women’s empowerment in the development sector. World Development, 106, 111–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.002
5. Okali, C. (2012). Gender Analysis: Engaging with Rural Development and Agricultural Policy Processes. Future Agricultures Consortium, Working Paper 026.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献