Author:
Bosch-Rosa Ciril,Meissner Thomas
Abstract
AbstractExperiments involving games have two dimensions of difficulty for subjects in the laboratory. One is understanding the rules and structure of the game and the other is forming beliefs about the behavior of other players. Typically, these two dimensions cannot be disentangled as belief formation crucially depends on the understanding of the game. We present the one-player guessing game, a variation of the two-player guessing game (Grosskopf and Nagel 2008), which turns an otherwise strategic game into an individual decision-making task. The results show that a majority of subjects fail to understand the structure of the game. Moreover, subjects with a better understanding of the structure of the game form more accurate beliefs of other player’s choices, and also better-respond to these beliefs.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference34 articles.
1. Agranov, M., Caplin, A., & Tergiman, C. (2015). Naive play and the process of choice in guessing games. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1, 146–157.
2. Agranov, M., Potamites, E., Schotter, A., & Tergiman, C. (2012). Beliefs and endogenous cognitive levels: An experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior, 75, 449–463.
3. Blume, A., & Gneezy, U. (2010). Cognitive forward induction and coordination without common knowledge: An experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior, 68, 488–511.
4. Bosch-Rosa, C., Meissner, T., & Bosch-Domènech, A. (2018). Cognitive bubbles. Experimental Economics, 21, 132–153.
5. Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献