Abstract
AbstractWe experimentally study competitive markets with socially responsible production. Our main focus is on the producers’ decision whether or not to reveal the degree of social responsibility of their product. Compared to two benchmark cases where either full transparency is enforced or no disclosure is possible, we show that voluntary and costless disclosure comes close to the full transparency benchmark. However, when the informational content of disclosure is imperfect, social responsibility in the market is significantly lower than under full transparency. Our results highlight an important role for transparent and standardized information about social externalities.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Universität zu Köln
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference28 articles.
1. Bartling, B., Fehr, E., & Özdemir, Y. (2020a). “Does market interaction erode moral values?” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1–32.
2. Bartling, B., Valero, V., & Weber, R. (2019). On the scope of externalities in experimental markets. Experimental Economics, 22, 610–624.
3. Bartling, B., Valero, V., & Weber, R. A. (2020). The Causal Effect of Income Growth on Consumer Social Responsibility. Switzerland: University of Zurich.
4. Bartling, B., Weber, R. A., & Yao, L. (2015). Do markets erode social responsibility? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130, 219–266.
5. Benndorf, V., Kübler, D., & Normann, H.-T. (2015). Privacy concerns, voluntary disclosure of information, and unraveling: An experiment. European Economic Review, 75, 43–59.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献