Abstract
AbstractWe examine whether the way individuals randomize between options captures their decision confidence. In two experiments in which subjects faced pairs of options (a lottery and a varying sure payment), we allowed subjects to choose randomization probabilities according to which they would receive each option. Separately, we obtained two measures of self-reported confidence - confidence statements and probabilistic confidence - for choosing between the two options. Consistent with the predictions of two theoretical frameworks incorporating preference uncertainty, the randomization probabilities correlated strongly with both self-reported measures (median Spearman correlations between 0.86 to 0.89) and corresponded in absolute levels to probabilistic confidence. This relationship is robust to two exogenous manipulations of decision confidence, where we varied the complexity of the lottery and subjects’ experience with the lottery.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Abdellaoui, M., Li, C., Wakker, P., & Wu, G. (2020). A defense of prospect theory in Bernheim and Sprenger’s experiment. Working paper, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
2. Agranov, M., & Ortoleva, P. (2023). Ranges of preferences and randomization. Review of Economics and Statistics, Forthcoming.
3. Agranov, M., & Ortoleva, P. (2017). Stochastic choice and preferences for randomization. Journal of Political Economy, 125(1), 40–68.
4. Apesteguia, J., & Ballester, M. A. (2018). Monotone stochastic choice models: The case of risk and time preferences. Journal of Political Economy, 126(1), 74–106.
5. Arts, S., Ong, Q., & Qiu, J. (2020). Measuring subjective decision confidence. MPRA Paper 106811, University Library of Munich, Germany.