Author:
Mokhtarzadeh Fatemeh,Petersen Luba
Abstract
AbstractCentral banks are increasingly communicating their economic outlook in an effort to manage the public and financial market participants’ expectations. We provide original causal evidence that the information communicated and the assumptions underlying a central bank’s projection can matter for expectation formation and aggregate stability. Using a between-subject design, we systematically vary the central bank’s projected forecasts in an experimental macroeconomy where subjects are incentivized to forecast the output gap and inflation. Without projections, subjects exhibit a wide range of heuristics, with the modal heuristic involving a significant backward-looking component. Ex-Ante Rational dual projections of the output gap and inflation significantly reduce the number of subjects’ using backward-looking heuristics and nudge expectations in the direction of the rational expectations equilibrium. Ex-Ante Rational interest rate projections are cognitively challenging to employ and have limited effects on the distribution of heuristics. Adaptive dual projections generate unintended inflation volatility by inducing boundedly-rational forecasters to employ the projection and model-consistent forecasters to utilize the projection as a proxy for aggregate expectations. All projections reduce output gap disagreement but increase inflation disagreement. Central bank credibility is significantly diminished when the central bank makes larger forecast errors when communicating a relatively more complex projection. Our findings suggest that inflation-targeting central banks should strategically ignore agents’ irrationalities when constructing their projections and communicate easy-to-process information.
Funder
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference53 articles.
1. Adam, K. (2007). Experimental evidence on the persistence of output and inflation. Economic Journal, 117(520), 603–36.
2. Ahrens, S., Lustenhouwer, J., & M. Tettamanzi. (2016). The stabilizing role of forward guidance: A macro experiment, BERG Working Paper Series 137, Bamberg University, Bamberg Economic Research Group.
3. Alekseev, A., Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2017). Experimental methods: When and why contextual cues are important. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 134, 48–59.
4. Amano, R., Kryvtstov, O., & Petersen, L. (2014). Recent developments in experimental macroeconomics (pp. 1–11). Autumn: Bank of Canada Review.
5. Andrade, P., & Le Bihan, H. (2013). Journal of Monetary Economics, 60(8), 967–982.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献