Abstract
AbstractWe study the impact of endowments and expectations on reference point formation and measure the value of food safety certification in the context of fish trading on real markets in Nigeria. In our field experiment, consumers can trade a known food item for a novel food item that is superior in terms of food safety––or vice versa. Endowments matter for reference point formation, but we also document a reverse endowment effect for a subsample of respondents. The effect of expectations about future ownership is weak and mixed. While expectations seem to affect bidding behavior for subjects “trading up” to obtain the certified food product (a marginally significant effect), it does not affect bids for subjects “trading down” to give up this novel food item. Finally, willingness to pay for safety certified food is large for our respondents—our estimate of the premium is bounded between 37 and 53% of the price of conventional, uncertified food.
Funder
IFPRI, Policies Institutions & Markets
WorldFish, FISH
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference47 articles.
1. Abeler, J., Falk, A., Götte, L., & Huffman, D. (2011). Reference points and effort provision. American Economic Review, 101, 470–492.
2. Akerlof, G., & Dickens, W. (1982). The economic consequences of cognitive dissonance. American Economic Review, 72(3), 307–319.
3. Alphonse, R., & Alfnes, F. (2016). Consumer willingness to pay for food safety in Tanzania: An incentive-aligned conjoint analysis. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36, 394–400.
4. Andreoni, J., & Bernheim, B. D. (2009). Social image and the 50–50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica, 77(5), 1607–1636.
5. Banerji, A., & Gupta, N. (2014). Detection, identification, and estimation of loss aversion: Evidence from an auction experiment. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6(1), 91–133.