The tool effect is lower in older adults with or without cognitive impairments than in young adults
-
Published:2023-09-28
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0340-0727
-
Container-title:Psychological Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Psychological Research
Author:
Luyat MarionORCID, Dumez Kévin, Noël Myriam, Altintas Emin, Campion Cédric, Lafargue Gilles, Guerraz Michel
Abstract
AbstractGrabbing a phone from a table or stepping over an obstacle on the ground are daily activities that require the brain to take account of both object and the body’s parameters. Research has shown that a person’s estimated maximum reach is temporarily overestimated after using a tool, even when the tool is no longer in hand. This tool effect reflects the high plasticity of the perceptual-motor system (e.g., body schema updating)—at least in young individuals. The objective of the present study was to determine whether the tool effect is smaller in older adults. Forty-four young adults, 37 older adults without cognitive impairment and 30 older adults with cognitive impairment took part in the experiment. The task consisted in visually estimating the ability to reach (using the index finger) a target positioned at different locations on a table, both before and after using a rake. We observed a strong after-effect of tool use in the young adults only. Conversely, a tool effect was similarly absent in the older adults without and with cognitive impairment. Moreover, even before the tool was used, the maximum reach was overestimated in each of the three groups, although the overestimation was greatest in the two groups of older adults. In summary, we showed that the tool effect, observed in young adults, was absent in older adults; this finding suggests that with advancing age, the perceptual-motor system is less able to adapt to novel sensorimotor contexts. This lack of adaptation might explain (at least in part) the overestimation of motor skills often reported in the elderly.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,General Medicine
Reference33 articles.
1. Barra, J., Giroux, M., Metral, M., Cian, C., Luyat, M., Kavounoudias, A., & Guerraz, M. (2020). Functional properties of extended body representations in the context of kinesthesia. Neurophysiologie Clinique/clinical Neurophysiology, 50, 455–465. 2. Bernard, J. A., & Seidler, R. D. (2014). Moving forward: Age effects on the cerebellum underlie cognitive and motor declines. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Review, 42, 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.02.011 3. Bourgeois, J., Farne, A., & Coello, Y. (2014). Costs and benefits of tool-use on the perception of reachable space. Acta Psychologica, 148, 91–95. 4. Bourrelier, J., Kubicki, A., Rouaud, O., Crognier, L., & Mourey, F. (2015). Mental rotation as an indicator of motor representation in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 7, 238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00238 5. Caffier, D., Luyat, M., Crémoux, S., Gillet, C., Ido, G., Barbier, F., & Naveteur, J. (2019). Do older people accurately estimate the length of their first step during gait initiation? Experimental Aging Research, 45(4), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2019.1627495
|
|