Author:
Schils Ludivine A. P.,Koch Iring,Huang Pi-Chun,Hsieh Shulan,Stephan Denise N.
Abstract
AbstractPrevious studies on crossmodal visual-auditory attention switching using a spatial discrimination task showed performance costs when the target modality changed relative to when it repeated. The present study (n = 42 for each age group) examined age-related changes in crossmodal attention switching by asking young (age range 19 to 30 years old) and older (age range 64 to 80 years old) participants to respond to unimodal central cues and bimodal lateralized stimuli. The participants’ task was to indicate the location of the target in the relevant modality using button presses. Results showed general attention switch costs. Additionally, we found no specific age-related increase of attention switch costs (no difference in performance between switch and repetition of target modality), but age-related increased mixing costs (decreased performance for repetition in modality-mixed condition compared to single target modality). Moreover, spatial distraction produced a crossmodal congruency effect, which was only slightly larger in older adults. Taken together, age-related increased mixing costs suggest a general difficulty with maintaining more than one task, but no specific age-related crossmodal impairment in crossmodal attention switching.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Chen, E. H., & Hsieh, S. (2023). The effect of age on task switching: Updated and extended meta-analyzes. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 87, 2011–2030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01794-z.
2. De Dieuleveult, A. L., Siemonsma, P. C., Van Erp, J. B., & Brouwer, A. M. (2017). Effects of aging in multisensory integration: A systematic review. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9(80), 1–14.
3. Evans, K. K., & Treisman, A. (2010). Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features. Journal of Vision, 10(1), 1–12.
4. Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 777–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.777.
5. Ging-Jehli, N. R., & Ratcliff, R. (2020). Effects of aging in a task-switch paradigm with the diffusion decision model. Psychology and Aging, 35(6), 850.