Negative affordance effect: automatic response inhibition triggered by handle orientation of non-target object
-
Published:2021-09-25
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0340-0727
-
Container-title:Psychological Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Psychological Research
Author:
Vainio L.ORCID, Tiippana K., Peromaa T., Kuuramo C., Kurki I.
Abstract
AbstractHabituated response tendency associated with affordance of an object is automatically inhibited if this affordance cue is extracted from a non-target object. This study presents two go/no-go experiments investigating whether this response control operates in response selection processes and whether it is linked to conflict-monitoring mechanisms. In the first experiment, the participants performed responses with one hand, and in the second experiment, with two hands. In addition, both experiments consisted of two blocks with varying frequency of go conditions (25%-go vs. 75%-go). The non-target-related response inhibition effect was only observed in Experiment 2 when the task required selecting between two hands. Additionally, the results did not reveal patterns typically related to conflict monitoring when go-frequency is manipulated and when a stimulus–response compatibility effect is examined relative to congruency condition of the previous trial. The study shows that the non-target-related response inhibition assists hand selection and is relatively resistant to conflict-monitoring processes.
Funder
University of Helsinki including Helsinki University Central Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,General Medicine
Reference65 articles.
1. Anderson, S. J., Yamagishi, N., & Karavia, V. (2002). Attentional processes link perception and action. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1497), 1225–1232. 2. Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365–377. 3. Bernier, P. M., Cieslak, M., & Grafton, S. T. (2012). Effector selection precedes reach planning in the dorsal parietofrontal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108(1), 57–68. 4. Bolton, D. A., Cole, D. M., Butler, B., Mansour, M., Rydalch, G., McDannald, D. W., & Schwartz, S. E. (2019). Motor preparation for compensatory reach-to-grasp responses when viewing a wall-mounted safety handle. Cortex, 117, 135–146. 5. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|