Author:
Wright David J.,Holmes Paul S.
Abstract
Abstract(Eaves et al., Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 2022) summary review, showing positive behavioural effects of AOMI interventions, is a welcome addition to the field. Several recent studies, however, have reported that AOMI may be no more beneficial than independent MI, and, for some tasks, may add no benefit beyond that obtained via physical practice. We discuss evidence to balance the narrative but support the pragmatic reasons why AOMI remains a suitable and appealing form of action simulation. We propose that further research interrogation of the discrete AOMI states through a more continuum-based approach could address some of the inconsistent data seen in AOMI research.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,General Medicine
Reference14 articles.
1. Chye, S., Valappil, A. C., Wright, D. J., Frank, C., Shearer, D. A., Tyler, C. J., Diss, C. E., Mian, O. S., Tillin, N. A., & Bruton, A. M. (2022). The effects of combined action observation and motor imagery on corticospinal excitability and movement outcomes: Two meta-analyses. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 143, 104911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104911
2. Eaves, D. L., Hodges, N. J., Buckingham, G., Buccino, G., & Vogt, S. (2022). Enhancing motor imagery practice using synchronous action observation. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01768-7
3. Frank, C., Wright, D. J., & Holmes, P. S. (2020). Mental simulation and neurocognition: Advances for motor imagery and action observation training in sport. In D. Hackfort & R. J. Schinke (Eds.), The Routledge International Encyclopedia of Sport and Exercise Psychology: Volume 2 Applied and Practical Measures (1st ed., pp. 411–428). Routledge.
4. Holmes, P., & Calmels, C. (2008). A neuroscientific review of imagery and action observation use in sport. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40(5), 433–445. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.40.5.433-445
5. Marshall, B., & Wright, D. J. (2016). Layered stimulus response training versus combined action observation and motor imagery: Effects of golf putting performance and imagery ability characteristics. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 11(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/jirspa-2016-0007