Author:
Bugg Julie M.,Braver Todd S.
Funder
National Institute of Mental Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,General Medicine
Reference77 articles.
1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Switching intentional set: exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance, XV (pp. 421–452). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
2. Askren, M. K. A. (2010). You can’t have it both ways: An examination of congruency effects in task switching. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
3. Bakeman, R. (2005). Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behavior Research Methods,
37, 379–384.
4. Blais, C., & Bunge, S. (2010). Behavioral and neural evidence for item-specific performance monitoring. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
22, 2758–2767.
5. Blais, C., Harris, M. B., Guerrero, J. V., & Bunge, S. A. (2012). Rethinking the role of automaticity in cognitive control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
65, 268–276.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献