1. L. LEYDESDORFF, Problems with the “measurement” of national scientific performance,Science and Public Policy, 15 (1988) 149–152; J. ANDERSON, P. M. D. COLLINS J. IRVINE, P. A. ISARD, B. R. MARTIN, F. NARIN, K. STEVENS, ‘On-line approaches to measuring national scientific output—A cautionary tale’,Science and Public Policy, 15 (1988) 153–161; L. LEYDESDORFF, ‘Performance figures for British science’,Science and Public Policy, 15 (1988) 270.
2. Among others: B. R. MARTIN, J. IRVINE, ‘Assessing basic research: Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy’,Research Policy, 12 (1983) 61–90; H.F. MOED, W. J. M. BURGER, J. G. FRANKFORT, A. F. J. Van RAAN,On the Measurement of Research Performance: The Use of Bibliometric Indicators, Research Policy Unit, Leiden, 1983; T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, A. SCHUBERT,Scientometric Indicators. A 32-Country Comparative Evaluation of Publishing Performance and Citation Impact. World Scientific, Singapore/Philadelphia, 1985; M. CALLON, L. LEYDESDORFF ‘La recherche française, est-elle en bonne santé,La Recherche, number 86, March 1987, 412–19.
3. E. GARFIELD,Citation Indexing, New York, etc.: Wiley, 1979.
4. F. NARIN,Evaluative Bibliometrics, Computer Horizons Inc., Cherry Hill, 1976.
5. For example: T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, A. SCHUBERT, World flash on basic research. The newest version of the facts and figures on publication output and relative citation impact of 100 countries, 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 13 (1988) 181–188; T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, A. SCHUBERT, An alternative quantitative approach to the assessment of national performance in basic research; Ciba-Foundation Symposium onThe Evaluation of Scientific Research, London, 6–8 June 1988: T. BRAUN, A. SCHUBERT, S. ZSINDELY, The decline of British analytical chemistry: Fact or artifact,Analytical Proceedings, 26/3 (1989) 87–91.