1. Heaton, J. M., andParker, A. J. (1994): ‘In vitro comparison of the Groningen high resistance, Groningen low resistence and Provox speaking valves’,J. Laryngol. Otol.,108, pp. 321–324
2. Hilgers, F. J. M., andSchouwenburg, P. F. (1990): ‘A new low-resistance, self-retaining prosthesis (ProvoxTM) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy’,Laryngoscope,100, pp. 1202–1207
3. Hillman, R. E., Holemberg, E., Walsh, M., andVaughan, C. (1985): ‘Aerodynamic assessment of the Henley-Cohn tracheoesophageal prosthesis’,Laryngoscope,95, pp. 1251–1254
4. Jebria, A. B., Gioux, H. M., DeVars, F., andTraissac, I. (1987a): ‘Aerodynamic characteristics of a voice prosthesis’,Ninth Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 1727–1728
5. Jebria, A. B., Henry, C., Petit, J., Gioux, H. M., DeVars, F. andTraissac, L. (1987b): ‘Physical and aerodynamic features of the Bordeaux voice prosthesis’,Artif. Organs,11, pp. 383–387