A Socio-ecological Imperative for Broadening Participation in Coastal and Estuarine Research and Management
-
Published:2021-05-18
Issue:1
Volume:45
Page:38-48
-
ISSN:1559-2723
-
Container-title:Estuaries and Coasts
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Estuaries and Coasts
Author:
Harris L.A.ORCID, Grayson T., Neckles H.A., Emrich C.T., Lewis K.A., Grimes K.W., Williamson S., Garza C., Whitcraft C.R., Pollack J. Beseres, Talley D.M., Fertig B., Palinkas C.M., Park S., Vaudrey J.M.P., Fitzgerald A.M., Quispe J.
Abstract
AbstractFor most of the scientific disciplines associated with coastal and estuarine research, workforce representation does not match the demographics of communities we serve, especially for Black, Hispanic or Latino, and Indigenous peoples. This essay provides an overview of this inequity and identifies how a scientific society can catalyze representational, structural, and interactional diversity to achieve greater inclusion. Needed changes go beyond representational diversity and require an intentional commitment to build capacity through inclusivity and community engagement by supporting anti-racist policies and actions. We want to realize a sense of belonging on the part of scientists in society at large and enable research pursuits through a lens of social justice in service of coastal communities. Minimally, this framework offers an avenue for increased recruitment of individuals from more diverse racial and ethnic identities. More broadly, the mechanisms described here aim to create a culture in scientific societies in which social justice, driven by anti-racist actions, produces systemic change in how members of scientific societies approach, discuss, and address issues of inequity. We have written this essay for members of the coastal and marine science community who are interested in change. We aim to call in new voices, allies, and champions to this work.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference63 articles.
1. Allen-Ramdial, S.A., and A.G. Campbell. 2014. Reimagining the pipeline: advancing STEM diversity, persistence, and success. Bioscience 64 (7): 612–618. 2. Anadu, J., H. Ali, and C. Jackson. 2020. Ten steps to protect BIPOC scholars in the field. Eos 101. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EO150525. 3. Bennett, N.J., R. Roth, S.C. Klain, K. Chan, P. Christie, D.A. Clark, G. Cullman, D. Curran, T.J. Durbin, G. Epstein, A. Greenberg, M.P. Nelson, J. Sandlos, R. Stedman, T.I. Teel, R. Thomas, D. Berissimo, and C. Wyborn. 2017. Conservation social science: understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biol Conserv 205: 93–108. 4. Bernard, R.E., and E.H.G. Cooperdock. 2018. No progress on diversity in 40 years. Nat Geosci 11 (5): 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0116-6. 5. Blicharska, M., R.J. Smithers, M. Kuchler, G.K. Agrawl, J.M. Gutierrez, A. Hassanali, S. Huq, S.H. Koller, S. Marjit, H.M. Mshinda, H.H. Masjuki, N.W. Solomons, J.V. Staden, and G. Mikusinki. 2017. Steps to overcome the North-South divide in research relevant to climate change policy and practice. Nat Clim Chang 7 (1): 21–27.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|