Author:
Cloern James E.,Schraga Tara S.,Nejad Erica,Martin Charles
Abstract
AbstractNutrient enrichment has degraded many of the world’s estuaries by amplifying algal production, leading to hypoxia/anoxia, loss of vascular plants and fish/shellfish habitat, and expansion of harmful blooms (HABs). Policies to protect coastal waters from the effects of nutrient enrichment require information to determine if a water body is impaired by nutrients and if regulatory actions are required. We compiled information to inform these decisions for San Francisco Bay (SFB), an urban estuary where the best path toward nutrient management is not yet clear. Our results show that SFB has high nutrient loadings, primarily from municipal wastewater; there is potential for high algal production, but that production is not fully realized; and SFB is not impaired by hypoxia or recurrent HABs. However, our assessment includes reasons for concern: nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations higher than those in other estuaries impaired by nutrient pollution, chronic presences of multiple algal toxins, a recent increase of primary production, and projected future hydroclimatic conditions that could increase the magnitude and frequency of algal blooms. Policymakers thus face the challenge of determining the appropriate protective policy for SFB. We identify three crucial next steps for meeting this challenge: (1) new research to determine if algal toxins can be reduced through nutrient management, (2) establish management goals as numeric targets, and (3) determine the magnitude of nutrient load reduction required to meet those targets. Our case study illustrates how scientific information can be acquired and communicated to inform policymakers about the status of nutrient pollution, its risks, and strategies for minimizing those risks.
Funder
U.S. Geological Survey
san francisco estuary institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference89 articles.
1. Ackerly, D., A. Jones, M. Stacey, and B. Riordan. 2018. Francisco Bay Area summary report. California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment. Publication number: CCCA4-SUM-2018-005. Available at https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-07/Reg%20Report-%20SUM-CCCA4-2018-005%20SanFranciscoBayArea.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2020.
2. Anderson, D.M. 2009. Approaches to monitoring, control and management of harmful algal blooms (HABs). Ocean & Coastal Management 52 (7): 342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2009.04.006.
3. Arar, E., and G. Collins. 1997. In-vitro determination of chlorophyll a and pheophytin a in marine and freshwater algae by fluorescence. US Environmental Protection Agency, Method EPA 445: 1–23.
4. BACWA. 2018. Potential nutrient reduction by treatment optimization, sidestream treatment, treatment upgrades, and other means. Bay Area Clean Water Agencies Final Report June 22, 2018. Available at https://bacwa.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/BACWA_Final_Nutrient_Reduction_Report.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2020.
5. Bever, AJ., and M.L. MacWilliams. 2013. Simulating sediment transport processes in San Pablo Bay using coupled hydrodynamic, wave, and sediment transport models. Marine Geology 345: 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2013.06.012.
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献