Abstract
AbstractLong-term declines in coastal water quality and sedimentation can affect the restoration success of ecosystems such as seagrass and shellfish reefs. Resnagging coastal seascapes offers a potential alternative restoration method that is not reliant on abiotic conditions and which may enhance degraded landscapes for fish and fisheries. While common in freshwater ecosystems, such interventions are unusual for coastal seascapes despite log snags supporting significant benefits for coastal fish. In this study, we identify the spatial (e.g. seascape connectivity), habitat condition (e.g. log snag complexity and food availability) and water quality variables that best explain variation in fish assemblages on log snags to help prioritise the placement and design of resnagging efforts in estuaries. We surveyed fish assemblages on log snags using underwater videography at 363 sites across 13 estuaries in southeast Queensland, Australia, over 3 years. Sites less than 10,000 m from the estuary mouth, more than 2500 m from urban structures and located in water depths of < 3 m harboured more diverse fish assemblages. Sites less than 10,000 m from the estuary mouth with lower (< 25%) algae cover harboured greater total fish abundance and harvested fish abundance. Similar trends were found for the abundance of individuals from key functional groups, although these trends were mediated by other seascape contexts (e.g. the area of natural habitat) and water quality variables (e.g. chlorophyll-a concentration and dissolved oxygen saturation). Our results indicate that log snag placement in estuaries for benefits to fish and fisheries can be maximised if sites are planned strategically.
Funder
Healthy Land and Water
University of the Sunshine Coast
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference97 articles.
1. Abelson, A., D.C. Reed, G.J. Edgar, C.S. Smith, G.A. Kendrick, R.J. Orth, L. Airoldi, B. Silliman, M.W. Beck, and G. Krause. 2020. Challenges for restoration of coastal marine ecosystems in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Marine Science 7: 544105.
2. Airoldi, L., and M.W. Beck. 2007. Loss, status and trends for coastal marine habitats of Europe. Oceanography and Marine Biology 45: 345–405.
3. Anderson, D.R., and K.P. Burnham. 2002. Avoiding pitfalls when using information-theoretic methods. The Journal of wildlife management: 912–918.
4. Anderson, M., and S. Connell. 1999. Predation by fish on intertidal oysters. Marine Ecology Progress Series 187: 203–211.
5. Barbier, E.B., S.D. Hacker, C. Kennedy, E.W. Koch, A.C. Stier, and B.R. Silliman. 2011. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs 81: 169–193.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献