Abstract
AbstractIntertidal crabs display distinct morphological traits that allow differential interactions with biotic and abiotic features of the intertidal landscape, but are also influenced by allometry and sexual selection. This study aimed to explore the influence of sexual, allometric and habitat factors on morphological variation in the intertidal mangrove crab assemblage. A standardized photographic protocol was developed using readily available, low-cost technology to capture the morphology of carapaces and claws as sets of Cartesian landmarks. Digitization errors were 1 to 2 orders of magnitude smaller than the variation among individuals. In Tubuca seismella and Tubuca signata (superfamily Ocypodoidea), species that have traditionally been studied for sexual dimorphism, standardized major claw sizes were 2.8 and 3.7, respectively, times larger for males than females. Sexual dimorphism in claw size was also observed for Metopograpsus frontalis and Parasesarma longicristatum (superfamily Grapsoidea), with the largest claw in males being 15% and 33%, respectively, larger than in females. In contrast to size, claw shape did not relate to sex, except for T. seismella. Carapace shape, although variable among individuals and displaying asymmetry, was unrelated to sex. Claw and carapace shapes displayed high correlations, with values around 0.78. Carapace shapes grouped into taxonomic families and linked to habitat preferences, while claw shapes varied along a taxonomic gradient. These results complement studies on crab morphology that focus on specific factors or species, and stress the importance of multiple, interacting factors including sexual, allometric and habitat influences as drivers of morphological trait variability.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference68 articles.
1. Adams, D.C., M.L. Collyer, and A. Kaliontzopoulou. 2019. Geomorph: software for geometric morphometric analyses. R package version 3.1.0. https://cran.r-project.org/package=geomorph.
2. Allen, B.J., and J.S. Levinton. 2007. Costs of bearing a sexually selected ornamental weapon in fiddler crabs. Functional Ecology 21: 154–161.
3. Auffray, J.C., P. Alibert, S. Renaud, A. Orth, and F. Bonhomme. 1996. Fluctuating asymmetry in Mus musculus subspecific hybridization: Traditional and Procrustes comparative approach. In Advances in morphometrics, ed. L.F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G.J.P. Naylor, and D.E. Slice, 275–283. New York: Plenum Press.
4. Bookstein, F.L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bookstein, F.L., B.L. Chernoff, R.L. Elder, J.M. Humphries Jr., G.R. Smith, and R.E. Strauss. 1985. Morphometrics in evolutionary biology. Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献